Google’s Search Trademark Rules, Disputes and Adwords Policy

15 Apr. 2013 - - Total Reads 8,026

Google. It’s one of those brands in the past decade synonymous with goodness and all the internet could be about: positive and well-balanced work life. Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin certainly had that intention positioning the company well to do good (not evil) and bring about positive change online in the ’90s. Google Labs was a huge demonstration of this. Rolling out tons of free apps and tools, it was the envy of developers and software firms big and small. Even the Google headquarters, the Googleplex, was a place people and businesses around the globe would idealise as a new benchmark. Every software engineering student I knew at university would talk about wanting to work at Google like it was walking into heaven itself! While I’m certain the culture at camp Google hasn’t changed that much in recent years, it’s policies like, trademark rules, certainly have. Over the past few years Google have made more moves that are redefining the company, in a pretty straightforward way, something every business wants – to grow market share, maximise profits and reduce overheads.

Now, this isn’t an article bagging out the fine, founding virtues of the company. On the contrary, it’s about the commercial reality all businesses face. The ability to remain in the game, at the top or anywhere above the profit line is tied to the free market policy – you can only do so much good, and that good has to be good for the business.

Google’s expansive Labs project, which launched Gmail, Goggles, Maps, Reader, Docs and hundreds of other free and loved tools was closed more than a year ago. Disappointingly, Reader joins the official RIP list of more than 100 tools, following recent spring and winter cleaning press releases from Google. They are clearly starting to focus on platforms that lead to revenue and profit.

Google's Search Trademark Rules, Disputes and Adwords Policy

(Above – live example of Audi advertising on BMW keyword – 15th April 2013 )
Their biggest earner, Google AdWords, recently announced a massive and somewhat surprising change to their best practice. They are allowing advertisers to buy keywords associated with trademarks of other businesses. This means, starting April 23, Sony could start AdWords campaigns on search terms like “Panasonic” or “LG”.  Sure it can be argued it protects the open market for small and medium businesses. But if you are ACME accounting (ACME being your registered trademark), I’m sure you won’t be happy when I search for your company name and one of your competitor’s lands on top of you in the search results. But that’s exactly what Google are advocating with this announcement:

“Our trademark rules are designed to provide greater choice to users via Google ads. This is similar to the way a shopper benefits when they see a variety of brands’ products on a store shelf.

Even if they are looking for a particular brand of running shoe, for example, seeing many different options enables them to compare features, prices, and more to buy the best running shoe for them.

The same idea applies on the web – people searching for one brand of product should be able to easily find information about products from similar brands to make informed decisions.”

While I can see this balances the playing field for companies and simplifies the worldwide trademark policy for Google, it means a massive rise in offensive and defensive advertising requirements for companies, at the same time probably not hurting AdWords’ profits.

Add to this Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) which has changed so considerably in the past 18 months, the funding required for best practice and certainty in results, based on our clients’ spends, is tipping over to be more expensive than advertising. While Google have, in some ways, done the right thing with SEO, tailoring their algorithms to move away from low-cost offshore providers ramping up their search results with fake links and content, they have also aligned search to favour larger organisations, pushing power back towards advertisers including, of course, Adwords itself.

With organic and paid search being a priority for many companies and one of the largest companies on the planet now as focused as you on the bottom line, it is a real wake-up call for online marketing. My advice, after providing expert testimony in a recent online trademark dispute, is unless you’ve got deep pockets and enjoy litigation, start ramping up your digital sales channels to give your business a good spread across advertising platforms. This will not only serve as a great defensive strategy, if calibrated properly to ROI, you should also considerably grow your business.

Michael Simonetti
Posted by:

Post Reads: 8K

Share this

Go on, see if you can challenge us on "Google’s Search Trademark Rules, Disputes and Adwords Policy" - Part of our 168 services at AndMine. We are quick to respond but if you want to go direct, test us during office hours.

Add Your Comment

Trusted by

Melbourne Heart
Cronos Australia
Dial Before You Dig
Sunday Creek
GooglePlay
Arthur Galan
Hairhouse Warehouse
Moov Head Lice
Grays Ecommerce
Uber
Max’s
Think & Grow Rich Inc
PranaOn
News
ADP Payroll
POSTER Magazine
Google
Eway
James Buyer Advocates
Loan Market
Smart Company
Bondi Sands
Jetstar
Engine Swim
WTFN
Garmin
Oakdale Meat Co
Watches of Switzerland
Movember
National Relay Services
Craft CMS
Chia
Australian Anthill
Hanover
Sports Power
RMIT University
Tomorrow Stars Basketball
Australian Government
Vendor Advocacy Australia
Cleanfit
Instant RockStar
Buy Aussie Now
Green St Juice CO
CSquared Executive
McArthur Skincare
Australian Organic Food CO
Adobe Professional
BlackMores
Melbourne Central
Positive Poster
Heat Holders
NextTech
DUSA, Deakin University Student Association
Xavier
Parker Lane
CB Richard Ellis
Federation Square
Catholic Insurance
Drupal
Toni&Guy
QV Skincare
Scrum.org
Plants
Ubertas Group
Street Kitchen
Kadac
SunSense Digital Agency
Melrose Health
Bintani Australia
Magento
Tassal
OJAY
Van Egmond Group
DeeWhy Market
Metricon
Mecca Brands
National Museum of Australia
Boston Consulting Group
Coles
Fresh Cheese Company
White Suede
NMI Insurance
Dinosaur Designs
Elucent
Magento Solution Specialist
ABC
Victorian Government
131 Pizza
High Street Armadale
Rock Pool Group
The Age
SwinBurne University of Technology
Wild Rhino Shoes
Unsw Australia
Rydges
Bostik
Shell
Natralus Australia
Liveoneday
CAN- Common Wealth Bank
OMS – Order Management System
Ello
Cell Therapies
Focus On Furniture
MAP
Acquia Certified Site Builder Drupal
Grainshaker
One Shift
LBG Australia and New Zealand
Tribe
Brisbane Times
Royal Freemasons
Marshall White
AC/DC
Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre – MSAC
Grow Your Business
Castran Gilbert
Palace Cinemas
The University Of Melbourne
Atlantic Group of Companies
SMH – The Sydney Morning Herald
Melrose MCT
21st Century Australia Party
Naturtint
Passage Foods
Fairfax Media
Fast.co
VISSF
Oracle
Ego Pharmaceuticals
Bank of Cyprus
DepSkin.com
Microsoft Certified Azure Fundamentals
Celebrate Health
Engineers Without Borders
Jalna
Schiavello
Bigcommerce
The Burger Cheese
Appstore
Aqium Gel
The Fortune Institute
Macmillan Publishing
Forbes
Tek Ocean
Toy World
Arc One
Viktoria & Woods
Peter Mac
Bulk Nutrients
iPrimus
Switzer Media+Publishing
Telstra
Beaumont
Ebay
Federation University Australia
TPP
The Canberra Times
Carlton Football Club
Windsorsmith
Mamma Lucia
Amino Active
Australian Physiotherapy Association
Novvi
Paypal
Madman Entertainment
Rackspace
Etihad Stadium
Passage To India
ISO Certified
Matchbox Homewares
Plan It Sync It
Associated Press
Kay&Burton
MyAccount
Crumpler
Florsheim Shoes
GPT Group
Maxine

Testimonials

AndMine's Marketing Software ensures we stay on-brand no matter who in our office creates the campaign. We love that AndMine take all the IT complexity out of our online marketing so we can focus on results Emma Gleeson, QV Skincare

More Testimonials
AndMine-Google-Partner-Signature