Google’s Search Trademark Rules, Disputes and Adwords Policy

15 Apr. 2013 - - Total Reads 8,306

Google. It’s one of those brands in the past decade synonymous with goodness and all the internet could be about: positive and well-balanced work life. Founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin certainly had that intention positioning the company well to do good (not evil) and bring about positive change online in the ’90s. Google Labs was a huge demonstration of this. Rolling out tons of free apps and tools, it was the envy of developers and software firms big and small. Even the Google headquarters, the Googleplex, was a place people and businesses around the globe would idealise as a new benchmark. Every software engineering student I knew at university would talk about wanting to work at Google like it was walking into heaven itself! While I’m certain the culture at camp Google hasn’t changed that much in recent years, it’s policies like, trademark rules, certainly have. Over the past few years Google have made more moves that are redefining the company, in a pretty straightforward way, something every business wants – to grow market share, maximise profits and reduce overheads.

Now, this isn’t an article bagging out the fine, founding virtues of the company. On the contrary, it’s about the commercial reality all businesses face. The ability to remain in the game, at the top or anywhere above the profit line is tied to the free market policy – you can only do so much good, and that good has to be good for the business.

Google’s expansive Labs project, which launched Gmail, Goggles, Maps, Reader, Docs and hundreds of other free and loved tools was closed more than a year ago. Disappointingly, Reader joins the official RIP list of more than 100 tools, following recent spring and winter cleaning press releases from Google. They are clearly starting to focus on platforms that lead to revenue and profit.

Google's Search Trademark Rules, Disputes and Adwords Policy

(Above – live example of Audi advertising on BMW keyword – 15th April 2013 )
Their biggest earner, Google AdWords, recently announced a massive and somewhat surprising change to their best practice. They are allowing advertisers to buy keywords associated with trademarks of other businesses. This means, starting April 23, Sony could start AdWords campaigns on search terms like “Panasonic” or “LG”.  Sure it can be argued it protects the open market for small and medium businesses. But if you are ACME accounting (ACME being your registered trademark), I’m sure you won’t be happy when I search for your company name and one of your competitor’s lands on top of you in the search results. But that’s exactly what Google are advocating with this announcement:

“Our trademark rules are designed to provide greater choice to users via Google ads. This is similar to the way a shopper benefits when they see a variety of brands’ products on a store shelf.

Even if they are looking for a particular brand of running shoe, for example, seeing many different options enables them to compare features, prices, and more to buy the best running shoe for them.

The same idea applies on the web – people searching for one brand of product should be able to easily find information about products from similar brands to make informed decisions.”

While I can see this balances the playing field for companies and simplifies the worldwide trademark policy for Google, it means a massive rise in offensive and defensive advertising requirements for companies, at the same time probably not hurting AdWords’ profits.

Add to this Search Engine Optimisation (SEO) which has changed so considerably in the past 18 months, the funding required for best practice and certainty in results, based on our clients’ spends, is tipping over to be more expensive than advertising. While Google have, in some ways, done the right thing with SEO, tailoring their algorithms to move away from low-cost offshore providers ramping up their search results with fake links and content, they have also aligned search to favour larger organisations, pushing power back towards advertisers including, of course, Adwords itself.

With organic and paid search being a priority for many companies and one of the largest companies on the planet now as focused as you on the bottom line, it is a real wake-up call for online marketing. My advice, after providing expert testimony in a recent online trademark dispute, is unless you’ve got deep pockets and enjoy litigation, start ramping up your digital sales channels to give your business a good spread across advertising platforms. This will not only serve as a great defensive strategy, if calibrated properly to ROI, you should also considerably grow your business.

Michael Simonetti
Posted by:

Post Reads: 8.3K

Share this

Go on, see if you can challenge us on "Google’s Search Trademark Rules, Disputes and Adwords Policy" - Part of our 168 services at AndMine. We are quick to respond but if you want to go direct, test us during office hours.

Add Your Comment

Trusted by

ACTUATE IP
Forbes
Mecca Brands
High Street Armadale
Cleanfit
WTFN
Vendor Advocacy Australia
Wild Rhino Shoes
Celebrate Health
DUSA, Deakin University Student Association
Royal Freemasons
Eway
The Age
Victorian Government
Australian Physiotherapy Association
Natralus Australia
National Museum of Australia
Palace Cinemas
Novvi
Federation University Australia
Telstra
Acquia Certified Site Builder Drupal
Engine Swim
Arthur Galan
Fresh Cheese Company
Bintani Australia
Fairfax Media
White Suede
Arc One
iPrimus
Paypal
Etihad Stadium
GooglePlay
Loan Market
Beaumont
Movember
AC/DC
GPT Group
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Rackspace
Schiavello
Melbourne Central
Grow Your Business
DeeWhy Market
Grainshaker
Tribe
Grays Ecommerce
131 Pizza
Melbourne Heart
VISSF
Australian Government
Florsheim Shoes
PranaOn
Bigcommerce
Switzer Media+Publishing
The Burger Cheese
Unsw Australia
Shell
Windsorsmith
SunSense Digital Agency
Catholic Insurance
QV Skincare
The University Of Melbourne
Dinosaur Designs
Amino Active
Smart Company
Fast.co
Boston Consulting Group
Marshall White
Craft CMS
Xavier
Aqium Gel
Sports Power
Ebay
Bondi Sands
Buy Aussie Now
Ego Pharmaceuticals
Kay&Burton
Melbourne Sports and Aquatic Centre – MSAC
Moov Head Lice
Hanover
CB Richard Ellis
Magento
Maxine
Castran Gilbert
Watches of Switzerland
Garmin
Plants
ABC
McArthur Skincare
Google
Naturtint
OJAY
The Fortune Institute
Coles
CAN- Common Wealth Bank
Hairhouse Warehouse
Toy World
Appstore
Peter Mac
Matchbox Homewares
Madman Entertainment
James Buyer Advocates
Atlantic Group of Companies
Scrum.org
The Canberra Times
ADP Payroll
LBG Australia and New Zealand
Uber
Plan It Sync It
Bank of Cyprus
Dial Before You Dig
TPP
Think & Grow Rich Inc
Elucent
Australian Anthill
21st Century Australia Party
SMH – The Sydney Morning Herald
Magento Solution Specialist
Crumpler
Associated Press
Rydges
National Relay Services
Street Kitchen
NMI Insurance
Brisbane Times
Positive Poster
Viktoria & Woods
Heat Holders
Chia
MyAccount
Federation Square
Oakdale Meat Co
BlackMores
OMS – Order Management System
POSTER Magazine
Ubertas Group
Tomorrow Stars Basketball
RMIT University
Passage Foods
Jetstar
Kadac
Melrose MCT
Australian Organic Food CO
Oracle
Tassal
MAP
Bulk Nutrients
Macmillan Publishing
Engineers Without Borders
Tek Ocean
Rock Pool Group
CSquared Executive
Parker Lane
Jalna
Toni&Guy
Liveoneday
NextTech
Instant RockStar
Focus On Furniture
Green St Juice CO
Ello
Van Egmond Group
Metricon
Bostik
Adobe Professional
ISO Certified
Max’s
Cell Therapies
News
Carlton Football Club
One Shift
Sunday Creek
Cronos Australia
Drupal
DepSkin.com
Mamma Lucia
Melrose Health
Microsoft Certified Azure Fundamentals
SwinBurne University of Technology
Passage To India

Testimonials

The AndMine team have been delivering our digital strategy and online services for many years now. Strongly commercially aware they know our industry well and have consistently delivered winning results for Matchbox. David Cohen, Owner, Matchbox

More Testimonials
AndMine-Google-Partner-Signature